نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دوره دکتری فلسفه اخلاق دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه فلسفه و منطق دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
John Rawls introduced a practical and influential version of justice within social and political structures, deriving the principles of justice from the agreement of parties in the original position. Communitarians, as critics of Rawls, argue that his conception of humanity is abstracted from its social ties, portraying individuals as detached from the moral and social relationships that define them. Michael Sandel critiques Rawls for neglecting the concept of society in his definition of humanity. Alasdair MacIntyre contends that Rawls’s emphasis on the individual relegates society to a secondary role. Charles Taylor argues against the existence of a coherent set of universal principles of justice, suggesting that Rawls provides only a paradigmatic example while answering the wrong question. However, these communitarian critiques fail to recognize that Rawls's conception of humanity does not affect the validity or implications of his theory of justice. For Rawls, the primary concern is to establish a structure that ensures liberty and enables the possibility of a just society. The applicability of Rawls’s principles of justice across diverse societies and their positive impact on promoting justice serve as evidence for the strength and relevance of his theory of justice.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)